Small Scale Military Headquarters

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:37 pm**

Another oddity on Ebay from this guy:
http://cgi.ebay.com/1-18-Custom-Ultimat ... 2303b8f513

Check out the chain holding the mines and that polkadot peadot paint job does it for me every time.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:54 pm**

This guy is a joke.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:57 pm**

I think He's tried to sell this one once before, looks like the same pics.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:05 pm**

He did, and I could have sworn it sold. If it did, and he still has it...

...that would explain a few things.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:18 pm**

MY EYES

He dose ok planes, and good paint jobs but well....er.....

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:57 pm**

But its reversible, just like a camo smock, if you look under the Tiger its winter whitewash

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:12 pm**

I give the guy A for effort and a D- for results.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:14 pm**

Aslav wrote:But its reversible, just like a camo smock, if you look under the Tiger its winter whitewash

phil

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:16 pm**

He could just have made the dots too big for the ambush pattern. It's honestly not THAT bad looking. No worse than the octopus camo schemes from the late war. There is a place for speculation in this hobby, in fact it probably needs more of it, just not at this price.

He is probably overcompensating for the amount he might have paid for the FoV tiger tank.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:23 pm**

Main forum rule!!!

Dont tell him about this place!

Posted: **Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:53 am**

paulpratt wrote:He could just have made the dots too big for the ambush pattern. It's honestly not THAT bad looking. No worse than the octopus camo schemes from the late war. There is a place for speculation in this hobby, in fact it probably needs more of it, just not at this price.

He is probably overcompensating for the amount he might have paid for the FoV tiger tank.

I agree!

Posted: **Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:49 am**

* ......... jnewboy strikes again ! *

... lol

v MG

Posted: **Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:59 pm**

Aslav wrote:But its reversible, just like a camo smock, if you look under the Tiger its winter whitewash

thats good!

Posted: **Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:11 pm**

exether_mega wrote:
Aslav wrote:But its reversible, just like a camo smock, if you look under the Tiger its winter whitewash

phil

Volksdeutsch wrote:
Aslav wrote:But its reversible, just like a camo smock, if you look under the Tiger its winter whitewash
thats good!

Got a couple of grins

. I'm not sure were he get's his reference material. But he mentions he is an expert with published work.

Posted: **Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:35 pm**

I asked him a question

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:06 am**

Is it just me, or is the whole "anti tank mines dangling from a tank turret," a bit wonky? haha

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:12 am**

SolidSnakeEyes wrote:Is it just me, or is the whole "anti tank mines dangling from a tank turret," a bit wonky? haha

A snipers dream come true

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:23 am**

AHHHHHH

I wrote.

Cool tank!

How accurate is the ambush camo?

Good work...

Him

Thanks, The Armored SS divisions on the western front often used this exact camo pattern in conjunction with foliage covering the tank to allow ambushes on allied ground targets and were harder to see by the allied air power.

are we missing something??? or is he all doped up?

Man I need to do some ambush camo...
Only made it once and it looks

good looking ambush is a tedious process.....

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:34 pm**

Instead of harassing him on your high horse, why don't you ask where he found the reference and if he has a picture of it to share. Just say it looks unique and you've never seen it before.

Tact is a lost art.

Here are some polka dot patterns on a model:

http://www.dracostandard.co.uk/images/ambush7.jpg

Peadot SS uniform:

http://news.webshots.com/photo/22151765 ... 8659vNuAae

It's not hard to think that the SS would replicate the pattern from their uniforms if they felt it worked better.

Like i said, just ask. If he is wrong, whatever. no one is twisting anyone's arm to buy the piece, but with so much animosity and zero factual information being asked for, it's hard to complain about it.

Like i said before, this whole hobby could use some more creativity anyway.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:34 pm**

Paul is somewhat right here. The guy is trying some creative schemes and ideas although not factual. It just struck me as somewhat humorous when I saw the pics so I posted the comment. Don't need to make too much out of this.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:56 pm**

Creative paint schemes are fine when you are painting a VW Bug and everybody smiles when you see it. Smiles are not used in the same sentence with Tiger Tank...... it just does not work.

Calling yourself an expert and then showing a huge polka dot paint job is just wrong. Add in a overprice for that incorrect paint job is just laughable.

On this forum we welcome all comers, but please don't insult us by calling yourself an expert and then showing us that you are NOT an expert....

This man may be a talented painter but his paint job not accurate for any WW2 theater.

TTT

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:18 pm**

Threetoughtrucks wrote:Creative paint schemes are fine when you are painting a VW Bug and everybody smiles when you see it. Smiles are not used in the same sentence with Tiger Tank...... it just does not work.

Calling yourself an expert and then showing a huge polka dot paint job is just wrong. Add in a overprice for that incorrect paint job is just laughable.

On this forum we welcome all comers, but please don't insult us by calling yourself an expert and then showing us that you are NOT an expert.... This man may be a talented painter but his paint job not accurate for any WW2 theater.

TTT

Well said Threetoughtrucks.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:28 pm**

Threetoughtrucks wrote:Creative paint schemes are fine when you are painting a VW Bug and everybody smiles when you see it. Smiles are not used in the same sentence with Tiger Tank...... it just does not work.

Calling yourself an expert and then showing a huge polka dot paint job is just wrong. Add in a overprice for that incorrect paint job is just laughable.

On this forum we welcome all comers, but please don't insult us by calling yourself an expert and then showing us that you are NOT an expert.... This man may be a talented painter but his paint job not accurate for any WW2 theater.

TTT

Exactly

Im not looking down ay him from my high horse (king tiger) but for hiw to claim he is still on his high horse (tiger 1) and turn out that......

but lets not kill the dude.... with a little work he "could" do good. he knows how to paint.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:59 pm**

I totally agree with TTT and others.
Search for B-29's post on Indy Troop Car and Winter P-51 from last year in the customs forum. Just an example.

B-29 wrote: Winter P-51

B-29 showed his work and said it was a bit of fun.
Hey if you love the camo pattern on your favorite WW2 militaria and duplicate it straight onto a FOV Tiger, best of luck to you. I guess thats being creative.
But when you list a eBay 1/18 custom,(adding that you are an expert), of a doubtful historically correct paint job with anti-tank mines hung at every soft-point,it will probally get a bit of attention from the cyberpolice on 1/18 forums like this.

rant over.

edit: wasn't this the same guy selling out of shape Zimmerit coated Jagpanther(sp?) custom for $300 -$400 last year ?.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:53 pm**

Jagd tiger 2

Small Scale Military Headquarters

1/18 Tiger

1/18 Tiger

* stupid customs